Ontologia e gênero: Realismo crítico e o método das explicações contrastivas

0Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Over the last 15 or 20 years, some sort of elective affinity has been established between feminist epistemology and various kinds of post-modern constructivism. This has been done to the extent that both postures question the possibility of a neutral and universal knowledge relative to subjects that are conceived in terms of totalizing, homogeneous, and closed identities. However, in spelling out the dangers of essentialism and overgeneralizing, many concepts and categories which are central to the feminist theory have been questioned, generating an increasing skepticism about the possibility of emancipatory knowledge. My aim in this paper is to demonstrate that critical realism's replacement of epistemological questions for ontological ones and its method of contrastive explanations may contribute to the construction of a type of knowledge that is both critical and emancipatory. Simultaneously, this is a type of knowledge that avoids practices such as a priori universalization, overgeneralizing, and essentialism. © 2009 ANPOCS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hamlin, C. L. (2008). Ontologia e gênero: Realismo crítico e o método das explicações contrastivas. Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Sociais, 23(67), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-69092008000200006

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free