Implementation strategies for a universal acquisition and tracking channel applied to real GNSS signals

6Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper presents a universal GNSS receiver channel capable of tracking any civil GNSS signal. This fundamentally differs from dedicated channels, each customized for a given signal. A mobile device could integrate fewer universal channels to harvest all available signals. This would allow securing signal availability, while minimizing power consumption and chip size, thus maximizing battery lifetime. In fact, the universal channel allows sequential acquisition and tracking of any chipping rate, carrier frequency, FDMA channel, modulation, or constellation, and is totally configurable (any integration time, any discriminator, etc.). It can switch from one signal to another in 1.07 ms, making it possible for the receiver to rapidly adapt to its sensed environment. All this would consume 3.5 mW/channel in an ASIC implementation, i.e., with a slight overhead compared to the original GPS L1 C/A dedicated channel from which it was derived. After extensive surveys on GNSS signals and tracking channels, this paper details the implementation strategies that led to the proposed universal channel architecture. Validation is achieved using GNSS signals issued from different constellations, frequency bands, modulations and spreading code schemes. A discussion on acquisition approaches and conclusive remarks follow, which open up a new signal selection challenge, rather than satellite selection.

Figures

  • Table 1. GNSS Signals Survey.
  • Table 1. Cont.
  • Table 2. BOC Tracking Channel Architectures Classification.
  • Figure 1. Tracking Channel Simplified Architecture.
  • Figure 2. Sub-Carriers and Spreading Codes Module (BPSK vs. MBOC).
  • Figure 3. MBOC Sub-Carriers Multi-Bit Simplification and Combination of both Data and Pilot Components (Differential = Early − Late; Prompt)
  • Figure 4. Spreading Codes Module (BPSK vs. TMBPSK Overhead).
  • Figure 5. Single-Component Products and Correlation (BPSK vs. MBOC Overhead).

Author supplied keywords

References Powered by Scopus

Measuring the gap between FPGAs and ASICs

737Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Binary offset carrier modulations for radionavigation

494Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Fundamentals of Global Positioning System Receivers: A Software Approach: Second Edition

490Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Energy efficient GNSS signal acquisition using singular value decomposition (SVD)

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Area-efficient universal code generator for gps l1c and bds b1c signals

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Design of Universal Code Generator for Multi-Constellation Multi-Frequency GNSS Receiver

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fortin, M. A., & Landry, R. (2016). Implementation strategies for a universal acquisition and tracking channel applied to real GNSS signals. Sensors (Switzerland), 16(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/s16050624

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘22‘23‘2400.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 3

50%

Computer Science 1

17%

Social Sciences 1

17%

Sports and Recreations 1

17%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 22

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0