Application of ultrasound and curing agent during osmotic dehydration to improve the quality properties of freeze-dried yellow peach (Amygdalus persica) slices

21Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study aimed to improve the quality of freeze-dried yellow peaches (Amygdalus persica). Yellow peaches were pretreated with osmotic dehydration for 15 min prior to vacuum-freeze drying and supplemented with different ultrasonic power levels (180 W, 240 W, 300 W) and a curing agent (calcium lactobionate, CaLa) to investigate the effects on the quality of freeze-dried yellow peach slices. After vacuum freeze-drying the yellow peach slices for 48 h, their moisture, color, texture, microstructure, total phenol (TP) content and oligomeric proantho-cyanidin (OPC) content were determined. It was found that the auxiliary ultrasonic power with various levels, especially powered at 240 W, produced very favorable effects on the quality characteristics of freeze-dried yellow peaches. The average pore size of USOD-240 W samples was reduced by 57.07% compared with that of the FD samples. In terms of nutrient maintenance, USOD-240 W can also prevent nutrient loss to the greatest extent. The TP content (5.40 mg/g) and OPC content (14.42 mg/g) were always highest in each pretreatment. The addition of CaLa can further improve the quality of yellow peach slices. Overall, the application of ultrasound and CaLa to improve the quality of freeze-dried yellow peach slices along with osmotic dehydration before freeze-drying is a method worth considering.

References Powered by Scopus

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chu, Y., Wei, S., Ding, Z., Mei, J., & Xie, J. (2021). Application of ultrasound and curing agent during osmotic dehydration to improve the quality properties of freeze-dried yellow peach (Amygdalus persica) slices. Agriculture (Switzerland), 11(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11111069

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

50%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

13%

Researcher 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5

63%

Engineering 3

38%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0