Macroecology and meiobenthos: Reply to Warwick (2014)

9Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Warwick (2014; Mar Ecol Prog Ser 505:295-298) suggests that my claim that the biology of marine metazoan benthos may scale continuously with body mass (Bett 2013; Mar Ecol Prog Ser 487:1-6) is an overstatement. His alternative hypothesis is that there is a 'step-change' in allometric relationships between the meio- and macrobenthos. I continue to propose that simple null hypotheses for standing stock size spectra and species size spectra of the metazoan benthos, consistent with metabolic theory and macroecology, offer parsimonious solutions. For standing stock and species size spectra I present field data that conform to these null hypotheses. Data from other studies, such as those suggested by Warwick (2014), may be difficult to place in the macroeco - logical context, as those studies are constructed or presented in a different manner (e.g. they lack data on the number of individuals identified). I suggest that it may be useful to consider 'evolutionary species size spectra' separately from 'macroecological species size spectra'. Both are valid testable hypotheses, and are not necessarily contradictory. © 2014 Inter-Research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bett, B. J. (2014, May 28). Macroecology and meiobenthos: Reply to Warwick (2014). Marine Ecology Progress Series. Inter-Research. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps10831

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free