Mediastinal lymph node dissection versus mediastinal lymph node sampling for early stage non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

59Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the overall survival, local recurrence, distant metastasis, and complications of mediastinal lymph node dissection (MLND) versus mediastinal lymph node sampling (MLNS) in stage I-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Methods: A systematic search of published literature was conducted using the main databases (MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases) to identify relevant randomized controlled trials that compared MLND vs. MLNS in NSCLC patients. Methodological quality of included randomized controlled trials was assessed according to the criteria from the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Review of Interventions (Version 5.1.0). Meta-analysis was performed using The Cochrane Collaboration's Review Manager 5.3. The results of the meta-analysis were expressed as hazard ratio (HR) or risk ratio (RR), with their corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: We included results reported from six randomized controlled trials, with a total of 1,791 patients included in the primary meta-analysis. Compared to MLNS in NSCLC patients, there was no statistically significant difference in MLND on overall survival (HR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.08; P = 0.13). In addition, the results indicated that local recurrence rate (RR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.28; P = 0.67), distant metastasis rate (RR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.04; P = 0.15), and total complications rate (RR= 1.10, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.79; P = 0.72) were similar, no significant difference found between the two groups. Conclusions: Results for overall survival, local recurrence rate, and distant metastasis rate were similar between MLND and MLNS in early stage NSCLC patients. There was no evidence that MLND increased complications compared with MLNS. Whether or not MLND is superior to MLNS for stage II-IIIA remains to be determined.

References Powered by Scopus

Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses

48629Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis

26851Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cancer statistics, 2014

11522Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Early and locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

1544Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Lung cancer staging: A concise update

104Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Systematic lymphadenectomy versus sampling of ipsilateral mediastinal lymph-nodes during lobectomy for non-small-cell lung cancer: A systematic review of randomized trials and a meta-analysis

77Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huang, X., Wang, J., Chen, Q., & Jiang, J. (2014). Mediastinal lymph node dissection versus mediastinal lymph node sampling for early stage non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 9(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109979

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

67%

Researcher 7

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 24

86%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

7%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

4%

Computer Science 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free