Differential effects of resistance-and endurance-based exercise programs on muscular fitness, body composition, and cardiovascular variables in young adult women: Contextualizing the efficacy of self-selected exercise modalities

11Citations
Citations of this article
72Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

There is an evident lack of research simultaneously investigating endurance training (ET) and resistance training (RT) with regard to their potential influence on fitness and health status in young women. This study aimed to determine the effects of RT and ET three times a week over an eight-week period on anthropometric/body composition indices, blood pressure (BP), and muscular fitness in apparently healthy young women who participated in a self-preferred program. The sample of participants comprised 57 young healthy women (23.9 ± 3.08 years, 165.5 ± 5.8 cm, 66.8 ± 7.2 kg) divided into ET (n = 18), RT (n = 19), and non-exercising (C) (n = 20) groups. The variables con-sisted of anthropometric/body composition indices (body mass, BMI, body fat, and lean body mass), muscular fitness variables (lower body strength, upper body strength, abdominal strength, dyna-mometric force, and flexibility), and cardiovascular parameters (resting heart rate and systolic and diastolic BP). A pre-and post-testing design, with factorial analysis of variance for repeated meas-urements (ANOVA: Group × Measurement), including a consecutive post hoc test, was applied. The ANOVA indicated a similar improvement in body composition (increase in lean body mass and decrease in body fat percentage), resting heart rate, and flexibility in both of the exercise groups, with no significant changes in the C group. RT improved the participants’ strength and force capac-ities to a greater extent than ET. BP showed a trend of improvement in both of the training groups, but without statistically significant pre-to post-changes. Correlation analysis calculated with variables of pre-to post-differences (VDs) indicated poor associations between VDs, indicating relative independence of the obtained effects for the different variables in each training group. Although this investigation comprised apparently healthy young women, numerous positive changes indicated the efficacy of both programs in a relatively short period of time. While the participants in this study self-selected training programs, the evidenced positive effects can be at least partially related to this fact.

References Powered by Scopus

Physical fitness in childhood and adolescence: A powerful marker of health

2026Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Exercise training for blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

1117Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effects of endurance training on blood pressure, blood pressure-regulating mechanisms, and cardiovascular risk factors

685Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Resistance Training Induces Improvements in Range of Motion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

44Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Acute effects of verbal encouragement and listening to preferred music on maximal repeated change‐of‐direction performance in adolescent elite basketball players— preliminary report

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Oxidative Stress and Cardiovascular Complications in Type 2 Diabetes: From Pathophysiology to Lifestyle Modifications

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Versic, S., Idrizovic, K., Ahmeti, G. B., Sekulic, D., & Majeric, M. (2021). Differential effects of resistance-and endurance-based exercise programs on muscular fitness, body composition, and cardiovascular variables in young adult women: Contextualizing the efficacy of self-selected exercise modalities. Medicina (Lithuania), 57(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57070654

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

47%

Researcher 5

26%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

16%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Sports and Recreations 9

39%

Medicine and Dentistry 7

30%

Nursing and Health Professions 5

22%

Social Sciences 2

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free