Lateral nasal osteotomy: A comparative study between the use of osteotome and a diamond surgical burr - a cadaver study

15Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The ultimate goal of rhinoplasty is to achieve a controllable, reliable and an aesthetically pleasing result. Various approaches and instruments have been introduced for the correction of the bony walls of the nose to improve predictability of the procedure and to minimize the associated trauma. We conducted a cadaveric study comparing the results of osteotomy of the nasal wall using a diamond surgical burr with those using a 2-mm osteotome. Material and methods: Bilateral osteotomy of the nasal wall was performed on 10 cadavers. The 20 lateral nasal osteotomies were carried out on 7 females and 3 males of an age range between 61-91 years. A 2-mm osteotome was used percutaneously to perforate the lateral nasal wall of the right side. On the left side a 2-mm diamond surgical burr was introduced via an intraoral approach to thin out the lateral nasal wall. The in-fracture of the nasal bone was accomplished by controlled finger pressure. The nasal mucosa was inspected endoscopically and also dissected to identify any perforations or lacerations. The pattern of nasal fracture and the presence of any fragmentation of the bony segments were assessed clinically. Results: The in-fracturing of the nasal bone was accomplished by gentle pressure on the left side, but required more force on the contra lateral side. On the left side the in-fractured lateral nasal wall remained as one piece and no irregularities were seen. On the right side 3-5 bony fragments of irregular sizes and shapes were detected. There were 3-4 tears of the nasal mucosa, where the osteotome was applied. However, no mucosal tears were detected at the side, where the surgical burr was used. Conclusion: Osteotomy of the lateral nasal wall with a diamond burr via intraoral approach is more precise and associated with fewer complications in comparison with the use of the osteotome. © 2013 Ghassemi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

The lateral nasal osteotomy in rhinoplasty: An anatomic endoscopic comparison of the external versus the internal approach

108Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Nasal osteotomies: A clinical comparison of the perforating methods versus the continuous technique

98Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Curved Lateral Osteotomy for Airway Protection in Rhinoplasty

95Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Comparison of the Effect of Dexamethasone and Tranexamic Acid, Separately or in Combination on Post-Rhinoplasty Edema and Ecchymosis

47Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Current updates in nasal bone reshaping

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A comparison of piezo surgery osteotomies with conventional internal osteotomies as performed by trainee surgeons: A cadaveric study

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ghassemi, A., Ayoub, A., Modabber, A., Bohluli, B., & Prescher, A. (2013). Lateral nasal osteotomy: A comparative study between the use of osteotome and a diamond surgical burr - a cadaver study. Head and Face Medicine, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-9-41

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

71%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

18%

Researcher 2

12%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 18

86%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

5%

Arts and Humanities 1

5%

Engineering 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free