Carnot-like heat engines versus low-dissipation models

20Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper, a comparison between two well-known finite time heat engine models is presented: the Carnot-like heat engine based on specific heat transfer laws between the cyclic system and the external heat baths and the Low-Dissipation model where irreversibilities are taken into account by explicit entropy generation laws. We analyze the mathematical relation between the natural variables of both models and from this the resulting thermodynamic implications. Among them, particular emphasis has been placed on the physical consistency between the heat leak and time evolution on the one side, and between parabolic and loop-like behaviors of the parametric power-efficiency plots. A detailed analysis for different heat transfer laws in the Carnot-like model in terms of the maximum power efficiencies given by the Low-Dissipation model is also presented.

References Powered by Scopus

Efficiency of a Canot Engine at Maximum Power Output

2155Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An ecological optimization criterion for finite-time heat engines

601Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Efficiency at maximum power of low-Dissipation carnot engines

467Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Low-dissipation Carnot-like heat engines at maximum efficient power

41Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Diverging, but negligible power at Carnot efficiency: Theory and experiment

36Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Performance analysis and four-objective optimization of an irreversible rectangular cycle

23Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gonzalez-Ayala, J., Roco, J. M. M., Medina, A., & Hernández, A. C. (2017). Carnot-like heat engines versus low-dissipation models. Entropy, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/e19040182

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 2

40%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

20%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

20%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Physics and Astronomy 3

60%

Energy 1

20%

Engineering 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free