Leadership Styles of Nurse Managers and Employees' Organizational Commitment during the COVID-19 Pandemic

1Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the leadership styles of nurse managers and then determine the relationship of the respective styles with the organizational commitment of the nurse managers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A quantitative correlational study design was employed in this investigation. Simple random sampling yielded 259 nurses who participated in this study. It was conducted between October and November 2021 at the government hospitals of the Hail Region, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Results: The nurses' perceived that their nurse managers employed an idealized influence leadership style (9.15). Age, years of experience, and ward assignment were found to have no statistically significant difference on organizational commitment; however, a significant difference was found with nationality. No significant difference was found regarding age with idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, or management by exception; however, it differed significantly with individualized consideration, contingent reward, and laissez-faire leadership. No significant differences were found with the years of experience to idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, individual consideration, or management by exception; however, it was found significantly different with the contingent reward and laissez-faire leadership. Concerning nationality, a significant difference was found with idealized influence and inspirational motivation. However, no significant difference was found between nationality and intellectual stimulation, individual consideration, contingent reward, management by exception, or laissez-faire leadership. With the ward assignment, no significant difference was found with idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, or contingent reward management by exception; however, a significant difference was found with individual consideration and laissez-faire leadership. Conclusion: During the pandemic, nurse managers employed idealized influence leadership styles. Age, years of experience, and ward assignment were found to be of no significant difference to organizational commitment, but they did have a significant difference to nationality. Age differed significantly with individualized consideration, contingent reward, and laissez-faire leadership. Years of experience was found to be significantly different with contingent reward and laissez-faire leadership. Concerning nationality, a significant difference was found with idealized influence and inspirational motivation. With the ward assignment, a significant difference was found with individual consideration and laissez-faire leadership.

References Powered by Scopus

The measurement of organizational commitment

4748Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Transformational leadership and performance across criteria and levels: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of research

833Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Employee Well-being and the HRM-Organizational Performance Relationship: A Review of Quantitative Studies

619Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The role of human resource management and governance in addressing bullying, burnout and the depersonalization of junior and senior psychiatric nurses in Saudi Arabia

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alboliteeh, M. (2023). Leadership Styles of Nurse Managers and Employees’ Organizational Commitment during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Dubai Medical Journal, 6(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1159/000526315

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

60%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

30%

Researcher 1

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 3

38%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2

25%

Engineering 2

25%

Social Sciences 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0