Comparison between incidence of incisional hernia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy and by single port

9Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Surgeries with single port access have been gaining ground among surgeons who seek minimally invasive procedures. Although this technique uses only one access, the incision is larger when compared to laparoscopic cholecystectomy and this fact can lead to a higher incidence of incisional hernias. Aim: To compare the incidence of incisional hernia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and by single port. Methods: A total of 57 patients were randomly divided into two groups and submitted to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n=29) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy by single access (n=28). The patients were followed up and reviewed in a 40.4 month follow-up for identification of incisional hernias. Results: Follow-up showed 21,4% of incisional hernia in single port group and 3.57% in conventional technique. Conclusions: There was a higher incidence of late incisional hernia in patients submitted to single port access cholecystectomy compared to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Madureira, F. A., Gomez, C. L. T., & Almeida, E. M. (2018). Comparison between incidence of incisional hernia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy and by single port. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-672020180001E1354

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free