Evolving multiple resistance to EPSPS, GS, ALS, PSI, PPO, and synthetic auxin herbicides in Dominican Republic parthenium hysterophorus populations. A physiological and biochemical study

5Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Two Parthenium hysterophorus populations resistant (R) and susceptible (S) harvested in banana crop from the Dominican Republic were studied. All S plants died when the herbicides were applied at field dose, except with paraquat. For the R population, the order of plant survival was as follows: glyphosate and paraquat > flazasulfuron > glufosinate > fomesafen > 2,4-D. The resistance factors obtained in the dose-response assays showed a high resistance to glyphosate, flazasulfuron, and fomesafen, medium resistance to glufosinate and 2,4-D, and a natural tolerance to paraquat (resistance factor (RF) = 1.0). The I50 values obtained in the 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS), acetolactate synthase (ALS), and glutamine synthetase (GS) activity studies with glyphosate, flazasulfuron, and glufosinate, respectively, were greater in R than in S. The effect of fomesafen was measured by the Proto IX levels, obtaining five times more Proto IX in the S than in the R population. The resistance to 2,4-D in the R was determined by the lower accumulation of ethylene compared to the S population. The studies with 14C-paraquat conclude that the lower absorption and translocation in both the R and S populations would explain the natural tolerance of P. hysterophorus. This is the first case of multiple resistance to herbicides with different mechanisms of action confirmed in P. hysterophorus.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Palma-Bautista, C., Hoyos, V., Plaza, G., Vázquez-García, J. G., Rosario, J., Rojano-Delgado, A. M., & de Prado, R. (2020). Evolving multiple resistance to EPSPS, GS, ALS, PSI, PPO, and synthetic auxin herbicides in Dominican Republic parthenium hysterophorus populations. A physiological and biochemical study. Agronomy, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10040554

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free