In The Uses of Argument, Toulmin proposed a distinction between fielddependent and field-invariant standards for argument appraisal that gave rise to a relativistic understanding of his theory. The main goal of this paper is to show that epistemological relativism is not a necessary consequence of Toulmin's model of argument. To this end, I will analyze the role that fields are to play within this model, given a proposed conception of one of its key elements: the warrant of an argument. © 2006 Springer.
CITATION STYLE
Bermejo-Luque, L. (2006). Toulmin’s model of argument and the question of relativism. In Arguing on the Toulmin Model: New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation (pp. 71–85). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4938-5_6
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.