Soil analysis in discussions of agricultural feasibility for ancient civilizations: A critical review and reanalysis of the data and debate from Chaco Canyon, New Mexico

8Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Questions about how archaeological populations obtained basic food supplies are often difficult to answer. The application of specialist techniques from non-archaeological fields typically expands our knowledge base, but can be detrimental to cultural interpretations if employed incorrectly, resulting in problematic datasets and erroneous conclusions not easily caught by the recipient archaeological community. One area where this problem has failed to find resolution is Chaco Canyon, New Mexico, the center of one of the New World’s most vibrant ancient civilizations. Discussions of agricultural feasibility and its impact on local population levels at Chaco Canyon have been heavily influenced by studies of soil salinity. A number of researchers have argued that salinized soils severely limited local agricultural production, instead suggesting food was imported from distant sources, specifically the Chuska Mountains. A careful reassessment of existing salinity data as measured by electrical conductivity reveals critical errors in data conversion and presentation that have misrepresented the character of the area’s soil and its potential impact on crops. We combine all available electrical conductivity data, including our own, and apply multiple established conversion methods in order to estimate soil salinity values and evaluate their relationship to agricultural productivity potential. Our results show that Chacoan soils display the same salinity ranges and spatial variability as soils in other documented, productive fields in semi-arid areas. Additionally, the proposed large-scale importation of food from the Chuska Mountains region has serious social implications that have not been thoroughly explored. We consider these factors and conclude that the high cost and extreme inflexibility of such a system, in combination with material evidence for local agriculture within Chaco Canyon, make this scenario highly unlikely. Both the soil salinity and archaeological data suggest that there is no justification for precluding the practice of local agriculture within Chaco Canyon.

Figures

  • Fig 1. General location of Chaco Canyon Cultural Historical Park in relation to the Chuska Mountains. Four Corners is in upper left corner of figure at intersection of black state lines. Only selected major drainages contributing to or near Chaco Wash are represented. Black triangles are the three closest pedons to Chaco Canyon that have been sampled by the USDA.
  • Table 1. Comparison of variations in electrical conductivity measurement.
  • Table 2. Conversion equations for estimating measured electrical conductivity on a saturated extract.
  • Table 2. (Continued)
  • Table 3. This table shows estimated crop yield declines at particular soil or irrigation water conductivities. ECe is a measurement on the extract from a saturated soil paste. ECw is the conductivity of irrigation water with yield declines based on an estimated 15–20% leaching fraction. These data are always presented as guidelines, not definitive limits, and are for modern crop varieties. Given the range of tolerance within a given crop type, see squashes, it is possible that varieties used by Chacoan farmers were less susceptible than modern varieties largely grown in wetter climates. Data, except for sunflower, is from [81]. Amaranthus, found to be part of diets at Salmon Ruin and Antelope House, is considered a tolerant plant to salinity [82]. Chenopodium, Amaranthus, and Asteraceae were found to be significant diet contributions [82], and each is considered a halophytic, or salt adapted, plant.
  • Fig 2. Shows the relation of key water characteristics for 113 observations between 8/6/1976 and 10/6/1983. The average for pH (7.55) and EC (0.46) are each indicated by a solid line behind each data type. Chaco discharge is shown for visual comparison of covariation between periods of increased flow and EC.
  • Fig 3. Shows SAR variation from 41 measurements from 8/6/1976 to 10/6/1983. Max SAR/fine—the highest flat horizontal line—is the maximum SAR value usable for irrigation on fine textured soils under any management practice and is the highest flat horizontal line. Mean SAR represents the value of 5.74. No SAR issues—the horizontal shaded area at the base—indicates that below a value of 3 there is no projected impact from the Na composition. The Na/SO4 Ratio is the simple ratio of the USGS data for each reported in mg/L. Shaded vertical bars indicate the seasonal period of precipitation at Chaco Canyon: July through October.
  • Fig 4. Figure shows the location for all known soil salinity samples in the main are of Chaco Canyon. Larger circles are to avoid providing precise location information for non-public archaeological areas. Selected profiles are presented with values for single depth samples shown next to their location. Blue circles, connected by a simple smoothed line for visual interpretation, represent estimated ECe values in profiles. For sources that specify a depth range for specific samples, point depth is the range midpoint. For each salinity graph, the Y-Axis is Depth (cm), and the X-Axis is Estimated ECe. Vertical lines represent varying yield decrease thresholds for maize (moving left to right): Yellow = 0%, Peach = 10%, Orange = 25%, Brown = 50%, and (when shown) Red = 100%. See S1 Table for raw and converted data.

References Powered by Scopus

PRELIMINARY EXPERIMENTS ON HYDRODYNAMIC MOVEMENT INDUCED BY EVAPORATION AND THEIR BEARING ON THE DOLOMITE PROBLEM

220Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Archaeogenomic evidence reveals prehistoric matrilineal dynasty

189Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Assessment of different soil to water ratios (1:1, 1:2.5, 1:5) in soil salinity studies

170Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Archaeology for Sustainable Agriculture

45Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Water uncertainty, ritual predictability and agricultural canals at Chaco Canyon, New Mexico

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Ecosystem impacts by the Ancestral Puebloans of Chaco Canyon, New Mexico, USA

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McCool, J. P. P., Fladd, S. G., Scarborough, V. L., Plog, S., Dunning, N. P., Owen, L. A., … Thress, J. L. (2018). Soil analysis in discussions of agricultural feasibility for ancient civilizations: A critical review and reanalysis of the data and debate from Chaco Canyon, New Mexico. PLoS ONE, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198290

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

67%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

17%

Researcher 2

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 3

33%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

33%

Arts and Humanities 2

22%

Computer Science 1

11%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 5
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 150

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0