A comparison of data structures to manage URIs on the web of data

9Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs) are one of the corner stones of the Web; They are also exceedingly important on the Web of data, since RDF graphs and Linked Data both heavily rely on URIs to uniquely identify and connect entities. Due to their hierarchical structure and their string serialization, sets of related URIs typically contain a high degree of redundant information and are systematically dictionary-compressed or encoded at the back-end (e.g., in the triple store). The paper represents, to the best of our knowledge, the first systematic comparison of the most common data structures used to encode URI data. We evaluate a series of data structures in term of their read/write performance and memory consumption.

References Powered by Scopus

LUBM: A benchmark for OWL knowledge base systems

1162Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sesame: A generic architecture for storing and querying RDF and RDF Schema

838Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

RDF-3X: A risc-style engine for RDF

455Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Practical implementation of space-efficient dynamic keyword dictionaries

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dynamic Path-decomposed Tries

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

C-Trie++: A dynamic trie tailored for fast prefix searches

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mavlyutov, R., Wylot, M., & Cudré-Mauroux, P. (2015). A comparison of data structures to manage URIs on the web of data. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 9088, pp. 137–151). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18818-8_9

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘2102468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

90%

Researcher 1

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 11

92%

Engineering 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0