CONFIRMATION BIAS ESTIMATION FROM ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY WITH MACHINE LEARNING

2Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Cognitive biases are known to affect human decision making and can have disastrous effects in the fast-paced environments of military operators. Traditionally, post-hoc behavioral analysis is used to measure the level of bias in a decision. However, these techniques can be hindered by subjective factors and cannot be collected in real-time. This pilot study collects behavior patterns and physiological signals present during biased and unbiased decision-making. Supervised machine learning models are trained to find the relationship between Electroencephalography (EEG) signals and behavioral evidence of cognitive bias. Once trained, the models should infer the presence of confirmation bias during decision-making using only EEG-without the interruptions or the subjective nature of traditional confirmation bias estimation techniques.

References Powered by Scopus

Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases

22735Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises

4928Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Feeling Validated Versus Being Correct: A Meta-Analysis of Selective Exposure to Information

911Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Bias-Aware Systems: Exploring Indicators for the Occurrences of Cognitive Biases when Facing Different Opinions

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Leveraging emotional intelligence to foster proactive climate change adaptation: A study of engineering decision-making

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Villarreal, M. N., Kamrud, A. J., & Borghetti, B. J. (2019). CONFIRMATION BIAS ESTIMATION FROM ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY WITH MACHINE LEARNING. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (Vol. 63, pp. 73–77). SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181319631208

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘23‘2401234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

50%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

20%

Researcher 2

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 3

43%

Computer Science 2

29%

Philosophy 1

14%

Psychology 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0