Cuantificación sistematizada de la remodelación vascular in vitro en la morbilidad gestacional asociada al síndrome antifosfolípido

  • Velásquez B M
  • Álvarez G Á
  • Cadavid J Á
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is characterized by manifestations of thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity and antiphospholipid antibodies (aAPL) which can bind to trophoblast or to maternal en-dothelium, altering normal placentation. Aims: To evaluate the effect of sera from patients with APS on a three-dimensional in vitro model of vascular remodeling. Methods: Systematic quantification of the interaction between trophoblast and endothelium with the software Image J and the plug-in Angiogenesis Analyzer in a three-dimensional model of vascular remodeling and the detection of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) by ELISA. 25 women divided in three groups were included as follows: with pregnancy morbidity and thrombosis (PM/VT, n=7), pregnancy morbidity (PM, n=8), both groups with aAPL; pregnancy morbidity without aAPL (PM/aAPL-, n=10) and healthy women was used as control (NHS, n=7). Results: Sera from women with gestational morbidity: PM/VT, PM, PM/aAPL-, decreased endothelial angiogenesis, but on trophoblast, only the sera of two groups of women with aAPL had this effect along with reduction of VEGF. Sera from women with PM/aAPL- and PM/VT reduced angiogenesis in the co-culture of trophoblast and endotelial cells compared to NHS. In contrast to PM/aAPL-, sera from women with APS decreased angio-genesis in trophoblastic cells. Conclusions: The anti-angiognic effect of aAPL was focused on trophoblast and sera from PM/VT induced higher deleterious effects.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Velásquez B, M., Álvarez G, Á. M., & Cadavid J, Á. P. (2016). Cuantificación sistematizada de la remodelación vascular in vitro en la morbilidad gestacional asociada al síndrome antifosfolípido. Revista Chilena de Obstetricia y Ginecología, 81(6), 455–464. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-75262016000600002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free