De-colonizing one-shots Critical pedagogies and the ACRL Framework

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Librarians with instructional duties, particularly information literacy instructors or subject specialists, often rely on the “one-shot” format of instruction as a primary method for information literacy skills training and development. While not the only method of instruction, one-shots remain a foundational tool in information literacy instruction, although instructors are exploring other instructional formats. As a result, one-shots are regularly critiqued by librarians, who cite difficulties with the transactional nature and questionable effectiveness of the format. Many librarians cite concerns with the one-shot format based on time constraints, institutional culture, and discipline faculty discomfort with library instruction that is not directly and perceptibly tied to their own assignment requirements. More recently, conversations have highlighted the problematic nature of one-shots by uncovering the link between library instruction and faux neutrality, feminized labor, and campus power dynamics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baydoun, S., & Brillat, A. M. (2023). De-colonizing one-shots Critical pedagogies and the ACRL Framework. College and Research Libraries News, 84(3), 110–114. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.84.3.110

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free