Characteristics of oxygen concentration and the role of correction factor in real-time GI breath test

3Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective A high quality end-expiratory breath sample is required for a reliable gastrointestinal breath test result. Oxygen (O 2) concentration in the breath sample can be used as a quality marker. This study investigated the characteristics of O 2 concentration in the breath sample and the impact of using a correction factor in real-time breath measurement. Design This study includes two separate groups of patient data. Part 1 of the study analysed the patient's ability to deliver end-expiratory breath samples over a 2-year period (n=564). Part 2 of the study analysed a separate group of patients (n=47) with additional data to investigate the O 2 characteristics and the role of correction factor in breath test. Results The results indicated 95.4% of 564 patients were able to achieve an O 2 concentration below 14% in their end-expiratory breath. Part 2 of the study revealed that the distribution of O 2 concentration was between 9.5% and 16.2%. Applying a correction factor to predict the end-expiratory H 2 and CH 4 values led to an average measurement error of -36.4% and -12.8%, respectively. Conclusion The majority of patients are able to deliver a high quality end-expiratory breath sample, regardless of age or gender. The correction factor algorithm is unreliable when predicting the end-expiratory result at 15% O 2 and it would have resulted in false negative result for 50% of the positive cases in this study. It has also indicated that the continuous O 2 measurement is essential to ensure breath sample quality by preventing secondary breathing during real-time breath collection.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, S. M., Falconer, I. H. E., Madden, T., & Laidler, P. O. (2021). Characteristics of oxygen concentration and the role of correction factor in real-time GI breath test. BMJ Open Gastroenterology, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2021-000640

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free