Minimal invasive gastric surgery: A systematic review

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: As an alternate to open surgery, laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) is currently being performed in many centers, and has gained a wide clinical acceptance. The aim of this review article is to compare oncologic adequacy and safety of LG with open surgery for gastric adenocarcinomas with respect to lymphadenectomy, short-term outcomes (postoperative morbidity and mortality) and long-term outcome (5 years overall survival and disease-free survival). Materials and Methods: PubMed was searched using query 'LG' for literature published in English from January 2000 to April 2014. A total of 875 entries were retrieved. These articles were screened and 59 manuscripts ultimately formed the basis of current review. Results: There is high-quality evidence to support short-term efficacy, safety and feasibility of LG for gastric adenocarcinomas, although accounts on long-term survivals are still infrequent.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bushan, K., Sharma, S., & Attarde, N. (2015). Minimal invasive gastric surgery: A systematic review. South Asian Journal of Cancer, 4(3), 140–142. https://doi.org/10.4103/2278-330X.173173

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free