Regulating Fraud Revisited

2Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Many frauds (and other financial crimes such as money-laundering) are partly or wholly invisible to outsiders, being planned and executed in private and/or, even where the harms themselves are evident, being hard to attribute to the criminal fault of individuals, especially when committed in an organisational context. Many frauds — such as payment- card, some ‘advance fee’ frauds, ‘boiler room’ stock scams and ‘identity crimes’ — become visible after a while, though victims may prefer to believe that they are not victims of fraud. Others, such as price-fixing cartels and the manipulation by banks of LIBOR or Foreign Exchange rates, maybe wholly invisible to the public unless a whistleblower comes forward or some other event brings it to the notice of the authorities. Changes in legislation — for example the Fraud Act 2006 — have reduced the ambiguity of fraud allegations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Levi, M. (2014). Regulating Fraud Revisited. In Critical Criminological Perspectives (pp. 221–243). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137347824_12

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free