Preventing early-onset group B streptococcal sepsis: Clinical risk factor-based screening or culture-based screening?

3Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Two strategies are available for prevention of early-onset group B streptococcal (GBS) sepsis - clinical risk factor-based screening and routine culture-based screening of pregnant women for GBS colonisation. In our hospital, we switched from the former to the latter approach in 2014. METHODS: We compared the incidence of early-onset GBS sepsis during 2001-2015 between infants born to pregnant women who were screened for GBS colonisation and those born to women who were not screened. RESULTS: Among 41,143 live births, there were nine cases of early-onset GBS sepsis. All infants with GBS sepsis were born to pregnant women who were not screened for GBS colonisation. The incidence of early-onset GBS sepsis among infants of women who were not screened was 0.41 per 1,000 live births (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19-0.77) when compared to infants of women who were screened, for whom the sepsis incidence was zero per 1,000 live births (95% CI 0-0.19; p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Our data suggests that routine culture-based screening of pregnant women for GBS colonisation is a better preventive strategy for early-onset GBS sepsis in neonates when compared to clinical risk factor-based screening.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, J., Naiduvaje, K., Chew, K. L., Charan, N., Chan, Y. H., Lin, R. T. P., & Yong, E. L. (2021). Preventing early-onset group B streptococcal sepsis: Clinical risk factor-based screening or culture-based screening? Singapore Medical Journal, 62(1), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.11622/SMEDJ.2019155

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free