Introduction: Textured historicity and the ambivalence of imperial legacies

23Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In pursuit of a novel perspective on legacies of empire in the present, this introduction addresses prominent debates related to post-imperialism, collective memory, and the construction of historical knowledge, while also reviewing recent trends in post-Habsburg and post-Ottoman studies. First, I examine the insights and limitations of ‘memory studies,’ ultimately proposing a more capacious model of post-imperial ‘ambivalence.’ I then recapitulate Walter Benjamin’s dialectical approach to historical knowledge in order to anchor the signal conceptual contribution of the volume, ‘textured historicity.’ This discussion is followed by a meditation on the role of metaphors in conceptualizing post-imperial legacies and a roster of the most common metaphors for post-imperial legacies. Finally, the introduction briefly summarizes the volume’s constituent essays and the rubrics that unite them.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Walton, J. F. (2019). Introduction: Textured historicity and the ambivalence of imperial legacies. History and Anthropology, 30(4), 353–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/02757206.2019.1612387

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free