Many grammatical error correction approaches use classifiers with specially-engineered features to predict corrections. A simpler alternative is to use n-gram language model scores. Rozovskaya and Roth (2011) reported that classifiers outperformed a language modeling approach. Here, we report a more nuanced result: A classifier approach yielded results with higher precision while a language modeling approach provided better recall. Most importantly, we found that a combined approach using a logistic regression ensemble outperformed both a classifier and a language modeling approach.
CITATION STYLE
Madnani, N., Heilman, M., & Cahill, A. (2016). Model combination for correcting preposition selection errors. In Proceedings of the 11th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, BEA 2016 at the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, NAACL-HLT 2016 (pp. 136–141). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/w16-0515
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.