Addressing the “last mile” problem in educational research: educational researchers’ interest, knowledge, and use of implementation science constructs

1Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Although evidence-based practices can enhance educational outcomes, a persistent gap exists between research and practice. Advancing the understanding and use of implementation science among educational researchers has potential to close this gap. This study uses person-centered approaches to identify profiles of educational researchers (N = 140) according to interest, knowledge, and use of four implementation science constructs (determinants, strategies, outcomes, theories). We examined whether profile membership was predicted by researcher career level/type and project topic and type. Participants were moderately to very interested to learn more about implementation constructs, but were only a little to somewhat likely to be knowledgeable about them or incorporate them into their research. Three profiles were identified: High Knowledge/High Use/High Interest, Low Knowledge/Low Use/High Interest, and Low Knowledge/Low Use/Low Interest. Profile membership was not predicted by project type, topic area, or career level. Implications for enhancing implementation science training for educational researchers are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gaias, L. M., Cook, C. R., Brewer, S. K., Bruns, E. J., & Lyon, A. R. (2023). Addressing the “last mile” problem in educational research: educational researchers’ interest, knowledge, and use of implementation science constructs. Educational Research and Evaluation, 28(7–8), 205–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2023.2285440

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free