This paper discusses two possible difficulties with Catherine Lu’s powerful analysis of the moral response to our shared history of colonial evil; both of thesedifficulties stem from the rightful place of shame in that moral response. The first difficulty focuses on efficacy: existing states may be better motivated by shame atthe past than by a shared duty to bring about a just future. The second focuses on equity: it is, at the very least, possible that shame over past misdeeds ought to bebrought into the conversation about present duties, in a manner more robust than Lu’s analysis allows.
CITATION STYLE
Blake, M. (2019). Shame, Justice, and Decolonization: A Reply to Catherine Lu. Global Justice : Theory Practice Rhetoric, 11(2), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.21248/gjn.11.02.212
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.