ERCP for the initial management of malignant biliary obstruction–real world data on 596 procedures

1Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate outcomes of ERCP as first-line management in patients with malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) of all causes and stages, reflecting a real-life setting. Methods: Retrospective observational study of patients with ERCP as the first-line management of MBO at Oslo University Hospital between 2015 and 2021. Primary outcome measure was a ≥ 50% decrease from the pre-procedural bilirubin within 30 days after ERCP. Secondary outcome measures were technical success of ERCP, complications and overall mortality. Results: A total of 596 patients were included, median age 70 years. ASA score was ≥ III in 67% of patients. The most common cancers causing MBO were pancreatic cancer (52%), metastatic lesions (20%) and cholangiocarcinoma (16%). The primary outcome measure was achieved in 62% of patients. With endoscopic access, overall technical success was 80% with 85% for the distal extrahepatic group, 71% for the perihilar, 40% for the intrahepatic and 53% for multiple level MBOs. Reinterventions were performed in 27% of the patients. Complications occurred in 15% of the patients, including post-ERCP pancreatitis in 9%. Most complications were of minor/moderate severity (81%). Overall mortality was 33% within the first 90 days. Patients deceased by the end of the study period (83%) had median survival of 146 days (range 1–2,582 days). Conclusions: ERCP has a high rate of clinical effect and technical success in the management of both distal extrahepatic and perihilar MBO. Our data indicate that ERCP is a valid option in the first-line management of MBO.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mikalsen, I. M., Breder, S., Medhus, A. W., Folseraas, T., Aabakken, L., & Ånonsen, K. V. (2024). ERCP for the initial management of malignant biliary obstruction–real world data on 596 procedures. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 59(3), 369–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2023.2282375

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free