The Quality of Genetic Counseling and Connected Factors as Evaluated by Male BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers in Finland

4Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

There is little written about the quality of genetic counseling for men with the BRCA1/2 mutation. The purpose of this study was to describe the quality of genetic counseling and connected factors according to Finnish male BRCA1/2 mutation carriers’ (n = 35) perspectives and reasons for seeking genetic counseling. Data were collected from the Departments of Clinical Genetics at five Finnish university hospitals. The exploratory study design was conducted using a 51-item questionnaire based on a previously devised quality of counseling model and analyzed using non-parametric tests and principle content analysis. The satisfaction level with genetic counseling was high, especially with regard to the content of genetic counseling. The benefit of genetic counseling on the quality of life differed significantly (p < 0.001–0.009) from other factors. In particular, genetic counseling was in some cases associated to reduce the quality of life. Only 49 % of the male carriers felt they received sufficient counseling on social support. Attention to individual psychosocial support was proposed as an improvement to genetic counseling. Primary and secondary reasons for seeking genetic counseling and background information, such as education, affected the perceived quality of genetic counseling. The results of the study could be used to tailor genetic counseling for male BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kajula, O., Kääriäinen, M., Moilanen, J. S., & Kyngäs, H. (2016). The Quality of Genetic Counseling and Connected Factors as Evaluated by Male BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers in Finland. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 25(3), 413–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-015-9885-x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

64%

Researcher 4

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 9

41%

Social Sciences 7

32%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

14%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 3

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free