Cloze probability, predictability ratings, and computational estimates for 205 English sentences, aligned with existing EEG and reading time data

1Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We release a database of cloze probability values, predictability ratings, and computational estimates for a sample of 205 English sentences (1726 words), aligned with previously released word-by-word reading time data (both self-paced reading and eye-movement records; Frank et al., Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1182–1190. 2013) and EEG responses (Frank et al., Brain and Language, 140, 1–11. 2015). Our analyses show that predictability ratings are the best predictors of the EEG signal (N400, P600, LAN) self-paced reading times, and eye movement patterns, when spillover effects are taken into account. The computational estimates are particularly effective at explaining variance in the eye-tracking data without spillover. Cloze probability estimates have decent overall psychometric accuracy and are the best predictors of early fixation patterns (first fixation duration). Our results indicate that the choice of the best measurement of word predictability in context critically depends on the processing index being considered.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Varda, A. G., Marelli, M., & Amenta, S. (2024). Cloze probability, predictability ratings, and computational estimates for 205 English sentences, aligned with existing EEG and reading time data. Behavior Research Methods, 56(5), 5190–5213. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-023-02261-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free