Collecting, Analyzing, and Interpreting Response Time, Eye-Tracking, and Log Data

28Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This chapter argues for a distinction between protocol analyses and verbal analyses, with the former being used to confirm models for problem-solving tasks and the latter used in a more exploratory mode to study comprehension. Verbal response data may be used to assess comprehension of the problem to be solved as well as to indicate how the examinee characterizes and manipulates the problem space. The chapter discusses the use of non-verbal response process data at different stages of test development, from pre-concept through operational use. Timing data is also a useful component of data forensics efforts to construct indicators of various forms of cheating. Log data include both keystroke information and also data on a variety of other test-taker actions, particularly when touch screens, mouse movement and clicks, or a variety of other input devices are involved. Retaining gigabytes of data for each student and transmitting it to a central location could be quite daunting.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Oranje, A., Gorin, J., Jia, Y., & Kerr, D. (2017). Collecting, Analyzing, and Interpreting Response Time, Eye-Tracking, and Log Data. In Validation of Score Meaning for the Next Generation of Assessments: The Use of Response Processes (pp. 39–51). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315708591-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free