Screen more or screen more often? Using mathematical models to inform syphilis control strategies

47Citations
Citations of this article
79Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Syphilis incidence among men who have sex with men (MSM) continues to rise despite attempts to increase screening and treatment uptake. We examined the marginal effect of increased frequency versus increased coverage of screening on syphilis incidence in Toronto, Canada. Methods. We developed an agent-based, network model of syphilis transmission, representing a core population of 2,000 high-risk MSM. Epidemiological and biological parameters were drawn from regional surveillance data and literature-derived estimates. The pre-intervention period of the model was calibrated using surveillance data to identify 1000 credible simulations per strategy. Evaluated strategies included: annual syphilis screening at baseline coverage, increased screening frequency at baseline coverage, and increased coverage of annual screening. Intervention impact was measured as annual prevalence of detected infectious cases and syphilis incidence per year over 10 years. Results: Of the strategies evaluated, increasing the frequency of syphilis screening to every three months was most effective in reducing reported and incident syphilis infections. Increasing the fraction of individuals tested, without increasing test frequency, resulted a smaller decline in incidence, because reductions in infectious syphilis via treatment were counterbalanced by increased incident syphilis among individuals with prior latent syphilis. For an equivalent number of additional tests performed annually, increased test frequency was consistently more effective than improved coverage. Conclusions: Strategies that focus on higher frequency of testing in smaller fractions of the population were more effective in reducing syphilis incidence in a simulated MSM population. The findings highlight how treatment-induced loss of immunity can create unexpected results in screening-based control strategies. © 2013 Tuite et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021

1348Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Australian sexually transmissible infection and HIV testing guidelines for asymptomatic men who have sex with men 2014: A review of the evidence

90Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

100 Years of STIs in the UK: A review of national surveillance data

62Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tuite, A. R., Fisman, D. N., & Mishra, S. (2013). Screen more or screen more often? Using mathematical models to inform syphilis control strategies. BMC Public Health, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-606

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 28

64%

Researcher 10

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 19

48%

Nursing and Health Professions 10

25%

Social Sciences 8

20%

Computer Science 3

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0