T1 bias in chemical shift-encoded liver fat-fraction: Role of the flip angle

40Citations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate flip angle (FA)-dependent T1 bias in chemical shift-encoded fat-fraction (FF) and to evaluate a strategy for correcting this bias to achieve accurate MRI-based estimates of liver fat with optimized signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Materials and Methods: Thirty-three obese patients, 14 men/19 women, aged 57.3±13.9 years underwent 3 Tesla (T) liver MRI including MR-spectroscopy and four three-echo-complex chemical shift-encoded MRI sequences using different FAs (1°/3°/10°/20°). FF was estimated with R2∗ correction and multi-peak fat spectral modeling. The FF for each FA with and without T1 correction was compared with spectroscopy as a reference standard, using linear regression. Relative SNR of the magnitude data were assessed for each flip angle.. Results: The correlation between chemical shift-encoded MRI and spectroscopy was high (R2 & 0.9). Without T1 correction, the agreement of both techniques showed no significant differences in slope (PFlipAngle1=0.385/PFlipAngle3=0.289) using low FA. High FA resulted in significant different slopes(PFlipAngle10=0.016/PFlipAngle20=0.014. T1 bias was successfully corrected using the T1 correction strategy (slope:PFlipAngle10=0.387/PFlipAngle20=0.440). Additionally, the use of high FA (near the Ernst angle) improved the SNR of the magnitude data (FA1 vs. FA3; respectivelyFA1 vs. FA10 P≤0.001).. Conclusion: T1 bias is a strong confounder in the assessment of liver fat using chemical shift imaging with high FA. However, using a larger flip angle with T1 correction leads to higher SNR, and residual error after T1 correction is very small.. .

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kühn, J. P., Jahn, C., Hernando, D., Siegmund, W., Hadlich, S., Mayerle, J., … Reeder, S. (2014). T1 bias in chemical shift-encoded liver fat-fraction: Role of the flip angle. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 40(4), 875–883. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24457

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free