Comparative Benefit–Risk Assessment for Lidocaine 700 mg Medicated Plaster and Pregabalin in Peripheral Neuropathic Pain Following a Structured Framework Approach

5Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Peripheral neuropathic pain (PNP) is difficult to treat. Several oral drugs are recommended as first-line treatments. Nevertheless, many patients cannot obtain sufficient pain relief or do not tolerate systemically active treatments. Topical treatments, with a lower risk of systemic side effects such as lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster, are also recommended in treatment guidelines. This analysis compares the benefit–risk balance of topical 700 mg lidocaine medicated plaster with the benefit–risk balance of oral pregabalin administration for the treatment of PNP following current recommendations on benefit–risk assessment (BRA) methodology. Methods: The Benefit–Risk Action Team (BRAT) framework was used as structured approach. Selection of key benefits and risks was supported by a patient survey. Published randomized controlled clinical trials were the main source to identify data related to key benefits and risks. The outcome of randomized clinical trials was compared with real-world evidence (RWE) data for consistency. Results: Identified key benefits were pain reduction and improvement in quality of life. Key risks identified were application site reactions, dizziness, confusion, weight gain, peripheral edema, and blurred vision. Overall, there was similarity in key benefits between the comparators; however, a clear advantage regarding key risks in favor of lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster was observed. This observation was consistent across data from a direct comparison trial, randomized placebo-controlled trials, as well as data from RWE studies. The low number of randomized controlled trials for lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster was the main limitation. Conclusion: Guided by the opinion of patients regarding key benefits and risks deemed important for treatments of peripheral neuropathic pain, our analysis showed that lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster has a more favorable benefit–risk balance compared to pregabalin (300 and 600 mg daily).

References Powered by Scopus

Neuropathic pain in the general population: A systematic review of epidemiological studies

1205Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Neuropathic pain: An updated grading system for research and clinical practice

906Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Gabapentin for chronic neuropathic pain in adults

306Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Modeling of Microneedle Arrays in Transdermal Drug Delivery Applications

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Changing the paradigm in postherpetic neuralgia treatment: lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: real-world comparison between topical treatment with lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster and oral treatments

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sabatschus, I., Bösl, I., Prevoo, M., Eerdekens, M., Sprünken, A., Galm, O., & Forstner, M. (2022). Comparative Benefit–Risk Assessment for Lidocaine 700 mg Medicated Plaster and Pregabalin in Peripheral Neuropathic Pain Following a Structured Framework Approach. Pain and Therapy, 11(1), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-021-00340-2

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

33%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

33%

Researcher 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 2

50%

Social Sciences 1

25%

Psychology 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0