Proteus

7Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Classification. Proteus rods were described for the first time by Hauser in 1885. Proteus belongs to the Enterobacteriaceae family, and formerly this genus was placed in the tribe Proteeae with Morganella and Providencia rods. Apart from Proteus mirabilis and Proteus vulgaris, the two first species described, the genus Proteus contains also biochemically distinct bacteria, named P. myxofaciens. This species is the only Proteus species without any significance in the pathogenicity of human beings. P. myxofaciens produces slime rods, isolated from larvae of the gypsy moth. The biochemical as well as DNA–DNA hybridization analyses showed the homogeneity of P. mirabilis and heterogeneity of P. vulgaris species, which was subdivided into three biogroups based on fermentation of salicin, esculin hydrolysis, and indole production. Results of further studies made it possible to name biogroup 1 (genomospecies 1) Proteus penneri. These bacteria are indole-, esculin-, and salicin-negative. The name P. vulgaris was reassigned to biogroup 2 (genomospecies 2), as it turned out to be homogenous and represented a single species. The biogroup 3, consisting of four genomospecies, were studied using molecular and biochemical methods. Results of this study allowed O'Hara et al. to propose the separation of genomospecies 3 (DNase-, lipase-, and tartrate-negative) from another genomospecies, which was named Proteus hauseri. The Proteus genomospecies 4, 5, and 6 remained unnamed until now. Currently, the genus Proteus consists of five named species: P. mirabilis (type strain ATCC 29906), P. vulgaris (ATCC 29905), P. penneri (ATCC 33519), P. hauseri (ATCC 700826 and ATCC 13315), and P. myxofaciens (ATCC 19692), as well as Proteus genomospecies 4 (ATCC 51469), 5 (ATCC 51470), and 6 (ATCC 51471).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Różalski, A., & Stączek, P. (2011). Proteus. In Molecular Detection of Human Bacterial Pathogens (pp. 981–996). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350171992.0020

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free