The development of occupational science outside the Anglophone sphere: Enacting global collaboration

39Citations
Citations of this article
70Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The emergence of occupational science in non-English speaking countries is frequently hampered by diverse barriers to global collaboration, knowledge dissemination, and inclusion in international dialogue. Epistemological, cultural, and institutional resources may explain these barriers, yet these have not been explored within the discipline. This paper discusses three main issues and three priorities for action put forward by participants during sessions held at two separate, international occupational science conferences. The sessions aimed to engage the audience in critical reflexivity and dialogue around the challenges present when non-English speaking countries attempt to develop occupational science scholarship and possible ways to support global collaboration. To stimulate discussion, we used a participatory methodology, ‘Metaplan’. The sessions included a statements exercise, reflections presented by the authors, individual reflexivity, and small group debate. The findings are structured as a reflexive dialogue where participants’ voices, theory, and the authors’ reflections are interwoven to enrich discussion of the issues participants identified and priorities for action. This paper contributes to decolonizing the development of occupational science and promoting an international dialogue that is open to diverse worldviews, by drawing attention to the visible and invisible barriers that limit collaboration and inclusion of the diverse ways in which occupation is understood and enacted worldwide. TAMBIÉN PUBLICADO EN ESPAÑOLhttps://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2018.1551048.

References Powered by Scopus

Knowledge generation and utilisation in occupational therapy: Towards epistemic reflexivity

120Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Enacting the critical potential of occupational science: Problematizing the individualizing of occupation

109Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Resisting theoretical imperialism in the disciplines of occupational science and occupational therapy

94Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Action on the social determinants of health: Advancing occupational equity and occupational rights

31Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

‘Choice’ in occupational therapy theory: A critique from the situation of patriarchy in India

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Examining racial, ethnic, and cultural diversity in occupational science research: Perspectives of persons of color

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Magalhães, L., Farias, L., Rivas-Quarneti, N., Alvarez, L., & Malfitano, A. P. S. (2019). The development of occupational science outside the Anglophone sphere: Enacting global collaboration. Journal of Occupational Science, 26(2), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2018.1530133

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2405101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 24

67%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

17%

Researcher 4

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 29

74%

Medicine and Dentistry 5

13%

Social Sciences 4

10%

Chemistry 1

3%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 132

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0