Influence of hydraulic retention time on the psychrophilic hydrolysis/acidogenesis of proteins

0Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The influence of the hydraulic retention time (HRT) on the anaerobic hydrolysis of complex substrates has been studied under psychrophilic conditions. For this purpose, a continuous stirred tank reactor was operated at 15 WC and neutral pH and gelatin was considered as a model protein. Three HRTs have been tested: 12, 21 and 36 h. Gelatin hydrolysis was greatly dependent on HRT, increasing from 40% at 12 h-HRT to a maximum of 65% at 36 h-HRT. Molecular size distribution analyses of the effluent showed that hydrolysation of compounds larger than 10 kDa was poor at 12 h-HRT, whereas the fraction of 1–10 kDa was completely transformed into compounds smaller than 1 kDa. Higher HRT (36 h) improved the degradation of the recalcitrant fraction (>10 kDa), obtaining an effluent with around 95% of soluble molecules (<1 kDa). In that way, the use of membrane bioreactors for the treatment of this type of macromolecules could improve the degradation efficiencies by enabling to increase the residence time of the non-hydrolyzed molecules, with what would be possible to achieve higher organic loading rate operation.

References Powered by Scopus

Challenge of psychrophilic anaerobic wastewater treatment

453Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effect of low temperature on microbial growth: Lowered affinity for substrates limits growth at low temperature

403Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A comprehensive model of anaerobic bioconversion of complex substrates to biogas

339Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Poirrier, P., Schiappacasse, M. C., Carballa, M., & Lema, J. M. (2016). Influence of hydraulic retention time on the psychrophilic hydrolysis/acidogenesis of proteins. Water Science and Technology, 74(10), 2399–2406. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2016.425

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

67%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 7

47%

Engineering 4

27%

Chemical Engineering 3

20%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0