Manuscript title: Tidal range power generation: case studies combining the Lancaster 0-D generation and cost models

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Financial viability and political will ultimately determine if tidal range power schemes are developed. This research aims to demonstrate a robust system to make initial estimates of capital costs for tidal range schemes that can be compared between systems and options. A levelised cost of energy (LCOE) is used to compare a tidal range barrage (Morecambe Bay) and a coastal tidal lagoon (North Wales); the schemes are set in context with other common energy sources. The results show the Morecambe Bay barrage generates marginally more electricity than the North Wales coastal lagoon and has a shorter impoundment at lower cost. However, the economic arguments for both schemes are similar; both are viable as the LCOE shows. Despite being shown to be financially viable, the sources of funding may remain a problem. Financial returns and two potential public funding mechanisms are discussed. The approach using two simple models makes a strong case for more detailed analysis and, in the current environmental, economic, and social climate serious decisions must be taken.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vandercruyssen, D., Baker, S., Howard, D., & Aggidis, G. (2023). Manuscript title: Tidal range power generation: case studies combining the Lancaster 0-D generation and cost models. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Bridge Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1680/jener.22.00077

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free