Measuring culture effect size differences in Slovenian and Portuguese leadership practices: Cross-cultural leadership Universality or Contigency?

0Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper measures the cultural effect size across five types of leadership practices by using the Leadership Practice Inventory (LPI) instrument and drawing on the GLOBE research project framework. It tests cultural universality vs. contingency in five LPI leadership practices in an East-West EU comparison, both with an ex-socialist past. It employs four different effect size statistics. The paper contributes to the narrowing of the empirical gap in researching leadership practices in a small, East-West European country context. Only two of the five leadership practices show statistically significant effect sizes. Furthermore, the leadership practice Encouraging the heart is the only one to display a relatively moderate effect size. Thus, the evidence seems to support the universalist perspective over the contingency perspective.

References Powered by Scopus

Structural equations with latent variables

18332Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A theory of cultural values and some implications for work

2020Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Hofstede's model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith - A failure of analysis

1700Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rašković, M. (2014). Measuring culture effect size differences in Slovenian and Portuguese leadership practices: Cross-cultural leadership Universality or Contigency? South East European Journal of Economics and Business, 8(2), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.2478/jeb-2013-0004

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 18

82%

Researcher 3

14%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 11

58%

Social Sciences 5

26%

Neuroscience 2

11%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free