The clinical course of acute, subacute and persistent low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

19Citations
Citations of this article
148Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Understanding the clinical course of low back pain is essential to informing treatment recommendations and patient stratification. Our aim was to update our previous systematic review and meta-analysis to gain a better understanding of the clinical course of acute, subacute and persistent low back pain. Methods: To update our 2012 systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched the Embase, MEDLINE and CINAHL databases from 2011 until January 2023, using our previous search strategy. We included prospective inception cohort studies if they reported on participants with acute (< 6 wk), subacute (6 to less than 12 wk) or persistent (12 to less than 52 wk) nonspecific low back pain at study entry. Primary outcome measures included pain and disability (0-100 scale). We assessed risk of bias of included studies using a modified tool and assessed the level of confidence in pooled estimates using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. We used a mixed model design to calculate pooled estimates (mean, 95% confidence interval [CI]) of pain and disability at 0, 6, 12, 26 and 52 weeks. We treated time in 2 ways: time since study entry (inception time uncorrected) and time since pain onset (inception time corrected). We transformed the latter by adding the mean inception time to the time of study entry. Results: We included 95 studies, with 60 separate cohorts in the systematic review (n = 17 974) and 47 cohorts (n = 9224) in the meta-analysis. Risk of bias of included studies was variable, with poor study attrition and follow-up, and most studies did not select participants as consecutive cases. For the acute pain cohort, the estimated mean pain score with inception time uncorrected was 56 (95% CI 49-62) at baseline, 26 (95% CI 21-31) at 6 weeks, 22 (95% CI 18-26) at 26 weeks and 21 (95% CI 17-25) at 52 weeks (moderate-certainty evidence). For the subacute pain cohort, the mean pain score was 63 (95% CI 55-71) at baseline, 29 (95% CI 22-37) at 6 weeks, 29 (95% CI 22-36) at 26 weeks and 31 (95% 23-39) at 52 weeks (moderate- certainty evidence). For the persistent pain cohort, the mean pain score was 56 (95% CI 37-74) at baseline, 48 (95% CI 32-64) at 6 weeks, 43 (95% CI 29-57) at 26 weeks and 40 (95% CI 27-54) at 52 weeks (very low-certainty evidence). The clinical course of disability was slightly more favourable than the clinical course of pain.

References Powered by Scopus

The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

45898Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

11224Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range

7044Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Effects of Lifestyle Interventions on the Improvement of Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A critical review of the role of manual therapy in the treatment of individuals with low back pain

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Task-Specific Perceived Harmfulness Predicts Protective Movement Behaviour in Chronic Low Back Pain

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wallwork, S. B., Braithwaite, F. A., O’Keeffe, M., Travers, M. J., Summers, S. J., Lange, B., … Moseley, G. L. (2024). The clinical course of acute, subacute and persistent low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 196(2), E29–E46. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.230542

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 24

62%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

15%

Researcher 3

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 24

62%

Nursing and Health Professions 11

28%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 2

5%

Engineering 2

5%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 2
News Mentions: 128
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 4

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free