Online proctoring put to the test

3Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Traditionally, universities are places where students and professors physically interact. Knowledge and skills of students are generally tested in oral and written forms, on campus. In times of COVID-19, however, a new common in education is called for as students are unable to be physically present on campus. Both education and assessments need to take place at a distance. This development creates opportunities. However, education at a distance also bears risks, such as the risk of fraud. Universities are responsible for safeguarding the quality of education, assessments, and diplomas. Only students who actually master the learning objectives should receive a diploma. Online proctoring systems can help to achieve this. A challenging issue is that some students oppose these systems from the perspective of privacy and data protection. In view of the key focus of this book, moving towards a new common while preserving the best of the old common, it is thus important to put online proctoring systems to the test and consider their impact on human rights.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cuijpers, C. (2021). Online proctoring put to the test. In The New Common: How the COVID-19 Pandemic is Transforming Society (pp. 53–57). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65355-2_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free