On the evidence consistency of pharmacovigilance outcomes between Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System and electronic medical record data for acute mania patients

1Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Evaluation of premarketing drug safety in clinical trials is often limited, due to the relatively small sample size and short follow-up time. The data collected in the postmarketing spontaneous reporting systems such as Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System as well as electronic medical record systems provide crucial information to evaluate postmarketing drug safety. In this article, we assess the strengths and limitations of Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System and electronic medical record data in studying the postmarketing pharmacovigilance outcomes for 12 selected antidepressant drugs. In addition, we evaluate the consistency of the results obtained from these two data sources, and provide potential directions for evidence integration.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Duan, R., Zhang, X., Du, J., Huang, J., Tao, C., & Chen, Y. (2020). On the evidence consistency of pharmacovigilance outcomes between Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System and electronic medical record data for acute mania patients. Health Informatics Journal, 26(2), 753–764. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458219833093

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free