Nutritional status, as determined by the Mini-Nutritional Assessment, and osteoporosis: A cross-sectional study of an elderly female population

41Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the relationship between osteoporosis and nutritional status as determined by the Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA). Design: A cross-sectional study. Setting: Stockholm, Sweden. Subjects: A total of 351 elderly free-living women (mean age 73 ± 2.3 years). Methods: MNA (range 0-30 points; < 17 indicates malnutrition, 17.5-23.5 risk of malnutrition and ≥24 well nourished), measurements of bone mineral density of the left hip and lumbar spine using Hologic QDR 4500, and of the heel using Calscan DEXA-T. Results: The median MNA score was 27 (range 12.5-30). One woman was classified as malnourished and 7.4% were at risk of malnutrition. Osteoporosis of the femoral neck was observed in 22% and a fracture after the age of 50 was reported by 31% of the participants. The following items in the MNA questionnaire exhibited an increased risk of having osteoporosis in the femoral neck and/or total hip: an MNA score of < 27 (odds ratio (OR)=2.09; CI=1.14-3.83); a mid-arm circumference of less than 28cm (OR=2.97; CI=1.29-6.81); and regular use of more than 3 drugs each day (OR=2.12; CI=1.00-4.50). A body weight of more than 70 kg exhibited a decreased risk of having osteoporosis (OR=0.31; CI=0.14-0.70). Conclusions: In general, the nutritional status was good in this population of free-living elderly women. Nevertheless, half of the women who displayed an MNA score < 27 points had a two fold increased risk of having osteoporosis. © 2006 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Salminen, H., Sääf, M., Johansson, S. E., Ringertz, H., & Strender, L. E. (2006). Nutritional status, as determined by the Mini-Nutritional Assessment, and osteoporosis: A cross-sectional study of an elderly female population. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 60(4), 486–493. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602341

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free