Choices, choices: Comparing between CHOC'LATE and the classification-tree methodology

2Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Two popular specification-based test case generation methods are the choice relation framework and the classification-tree methodology. Both of them come with associated tools and have been used in different applications with success. Since both methods are based on the idea of partition testing, they are similar in many aspects. Because of their similarities, software testers often find it difficult to decide which method to be used in a given testing scenario. This paper aims to provide a solution by first contrasting the strengths and weaknesses of both methods, followed by suggesting practical selection guidelines to cater for different testing scenarios. © 2012 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Poon, P. L., Chen, T. Y., & Tse, T. H. (2012). Choices, choices: Comparing between CHOC’LATE and the classification-tree methodology. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 7308 LNCS, pp. 162–176). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30598-6_12

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free