Comparative Assessment on Machinability of Nano-Structured Bainitic Steel and Titanium64

  • Polishetty A
  • Sonavane C
  • Patil P
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Titanium64 has characteristics well sought after for applications in demanding environments. In general, due to titanium64’s high performance, it is a material which requires careful and well considered machining approaches in order to optimize the process. Nano-structured bainitic steel whilst having different application bases does none the less have similar machining and machinability short comes as that of titanium64. These similar characteristics have been compared and contrasted in this research study using parameters including cutting force, surface texture and metallography. The results tend to indicate that titanium64 has a poorer machinability characteristics compared to nano-structured bainitic steel. However, in terms of achieving greater surface texture characteristics, the nano-structured bainitic steel exhibited an enhanced capacity.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Polishetty, A., Sonavane, C., Patil, P., & Littlefair, G. (2014). Comparative Assessment on Machinability of Nano-Structured Bainitic Steel and Titanium64. Journal of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering, 02(07), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.4236/msce.2014.27004

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘20‘21‘22‘2301234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

80%

Researcher 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 2

50%

Psychology 1

25%

Materials Science 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0