In this chapter, I emphasize the kinds of social interaction that material expressions of ancestors enable, encourage or organize. For this, it is useful to consider Gell’s contention (1998: 20) that artworks are purposeful extensions, or agents, of people. Artworks are “persons” not in the biological, organismal sense, but from their role in mediating social relations. An object can actively shape interactions or initiate “causal sequences” (Gell 1998: 16) between its makers, users, patrons, audience, and indeed, itself—i.e., exert agency. The metaphor between artworks and persons deserves consideration here because many Andean ancestor effigies acted for and assumed the image of people. I contend that ancient Andean ancestors were like “persons”. This is precisely because, as objects of veneration, Andean effigies enabled crucial physical interactions between people and divinities.Three general questions guide this discussion:What were some of the principal forms of Andean ancestor effigies?Where do we find ancestor effigies and their veneration?And perhaps most important, what did ancestor images do?
CITATION STYLE
Lau, G. F. (2008). Ancestor Images in the Andes. In The Handbook of South American Archaeology (pp. 1027–1045). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74907-5_51
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.