Fast computation for genome-wide association studies using boosted one-step statistics

12Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Motivation: Statistical analyses of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) require fitting large numbers of very similar regression models, each with low statistical power. Taking advantage of repeated observations or correlated phenotypes can increase this statistical power, but fitting the more complicated models required can make computation impractical.Results: In this article, we present simple methods that capitalize on the structure inherent in GWAS studies to dramatically speed up computation for a wide variety of problems, with a special focus on methods for correlated phenotypes. © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

PLINK: A tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses

24570Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Least angle regression

7040Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A flexible and accurate genotype imputation method for the next generation of genome-wide association studies

3116Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A genome-wide association meta-analysis of self-reported allergy identifies shared and allergy-specific susceptibility loci

202Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Generalized estimating equations for genome-wide association studies using longitudinal phenotype data

39Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Genome-wide association study of rate of cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease patients identifies novel genes and pathways

32Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Voorman, A., Rice, K., & Lumley, T. (2012). Fast computation for genome-wide association studies using boosted one-step statistics. Bioinformatics, 28(14), 1818–1822. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts291

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 22

56%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19

51%

Computer Science 13

35%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

8%

Mathematics 2

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free