Developing Test Instruments for Measurement of Students' High-Order Thinking Skill on Mathematics in Junior High School in Makassar

7Citations
Citations of this article
97Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study aims to determine the procedure and to assess the quality of test instrument development to measure students' high-order thinking skill on mathematics in Junior High School in Makassar. The type of this research is a Research and Development with formative research model through 4 phases: preliminary, self-evaluation, prototyping and field test. The research subjects were the students of class VIII Junior High School in Makassar. The results of the instrument validity test was valid because in CVI (Content Validity Index) and CVR (Content Validity Ratio) the total average score was 1 with category very appropriate or at the interval 0.68 - 1.00. The result of student response test is 68.5% on positive category because more than 50% students responded positively. The reliability test indicated that the total average score was 0.923 with very high category (reliable) because it was at the interval 0.80 < (x) total score ≤60. Therefore, it is concluded that the students' high-order thinking skill at Junior High School in Makassar Makassar was in sufficient category.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

An Assessment of Eighth Graders’ Mathematics Higher Order Thinking Skills in the Chinese Context

1Citations
29Readers
Get full text
1Citations
15Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nursalam, Angriani, A. D., Darmawati, Baharuddin, & Aminuddin. (2018). Developing Test Instruments for Measurement of Students’ High-Order Thinking Skill on Mathematics in Junior High School in Makassar. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1028). Institute of Physics Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012169

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 15

52%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

34%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

7%

Researcher 2

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Mathematics 20

69%

Social Sciences 6

21%

Psychology 2

7%

Chemistry 1

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0