Conflicts of interest and recommendations in clinical guidelines, opinion pieces, and narrative reviews (Protocol)

6Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Methodology). The objectives are as follows: We will investigate whether: • Clinical guidelines written by authors with financial or non-financial conflicts of interest are more likely to recommend an intervention; • Opinion pieces written by authors with financial or non-financial conflicts of interest are more likely to recommend an intervention; • Narrative reviews written by authors with financial or non-financial conflicts of interest are more likely to recommend an intervention.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hansen, C., Bero, L., Hróbjartsson, A., Jørgensen, A. W., Jørgensen, K. J., Le, M., & Lundh, A. (2019). Conflicts of interest and recommendations in clinical guidelines, opinion pieces, and narrative reviews (Protocol). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2019(10). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000040.pub2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free