MR889, a neutrophil elastase inhibitor, in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial

87Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We investigated whether MR889, a synthetic cyclic thiolic elastase inhibitor, administered for a period of 4 weeks to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, is well-tolerated, and whether it modifies biochemical indices of lung destruction. The study was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial in COPD patients. Thirty subjects were administered MR889 orally at a dose of 500 mg b.i.d. for 4 weeks, and 30 received placebo following the same schedule. In addition to safety parameters, MR889 efficacy was checked by a pretreatment/posttreatment evaluation of levels of plasma elastin-derived peptides and urinary desmosine. There were no statistically significant differences between pretreatment and posttreatment efficacy parameter levels either in the control group or in the treated group. However, in a subset of treated patients with a short disease duration, the level of urinary desmosine dropped significantly with respect to pretreatment values (p = 0.004). We conclude that MR889 is safe to administer to COPD patients for a period of at least 4 weeks. During this time, MR889 does not modify biochemical markers of lung destruction in unselected COPD patients. Nevertheless, a subset of treated patients with fairly short disease duration showed a post-treatment reduction of desmosine urine levels, thus justifying the need for further studies to prove the efficacy of MR889 in modulating indices of lung destruction in COPD.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Luisetti, M., Sturani, C., Sella, D., Madonini, E., Galavotti, V., Bruno, G., … Grassi, C. (1996). MR889, a neutrophil elastase inhibitor, in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. European Respiratory Journal, 9(7), 1482–1486. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.96.09071482

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free