The Odds of Eternal Optimization in Optimality Theory

  • Boersma P
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The first part of this paper shows that a non-teleological account of sound change is possible if we assume two things: first, that Optimality-Theoretic constraints that do not contribute to determining the winning candidate are ranked randomly with respect to each other, i.e. differently for every speaker; second, that learners acquire as their underlying representations the forms that they detect most often in their environment. The resulting variation-and-selection scheme can be regarded as locally optimizing. It is shown, however, that it is possible that a sequence of such optimizing sound changes ends up in a loop rather than in a single absorbing final state. This kind of cyclic optimization is shown to be exactly what happened in the attested and reconstructed changes in the Indo-European consonant systems. The second part of this paper presents a simulation that shows that cyclic optimization is not only possible but also rather likely: twenty percent of all inventories are in an optimizing loop or heading towards one.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boersma, P. (2003). The Odds of Eternal Optimization in Optimality Theory (pp. 31–65). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0195-3_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free