Evaluation of PPIUCD versus interval IUCD (380A) insertion in a teaching hospital of Western U. P.

  • Gupta A
  • Verma A
  • Chauhan J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Comparative evaluation of PPIUCD and interval IUCD in terms of incidence of failure, expulsions, bleeding P/V and other complications. Methods: Total 300 willing women after counselling in antenatal, early labor or postnatal period were inserted PPIUCD after excluding chorioamnionitis, PROM >18hrs, Unresolved PPH, Puerperal sepsis. Another 150 willing women were inserted interval IUCD after excluding contraindications. All were followed up for 6 months. Results: Expulsion rate was significantly higher in PPIUCD as compared to interval insertions (4.3% v/s 2.0%; p value< 0.05). Number of removal of IUCD was almost similar in both groups(5.6% v/s 6.0%) but bleeding as a cause of removal was significantly more in interval group(23.5% v/s 88.5%). Common causes of PPIUCD removal were social. Conclusions: Postpartum insertion of IUCD is safe effective, feasible and reversible method of contraception. [Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2013; 2(2.000): 204-208]

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gupta, A., Verma, A., & Chauhan, J. (2013). Evaluation of PPIUCD versus interval IUCD (380A) insertion in a teaching hospital of Western U. P. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 204–208. https://doi.org/10.5455/2320-1770.ijrcog20130619

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free